News/Trends

5 Lessons to Close Cyber Resilience Gaps — Why Backups Alone Aren’t Enough

Rahul Deshmukh, VP of Product Marketing

Ransomware threats have evolved, and they now specifically target backup systems as the last line of defense. In fact, modern attacks are more likely to target backup environments than primary production systems. This means traditional backups alone are no longer enough for cyber resilience. Organizations must integrate security and recovery capabilities into their data protection strategies to keep pace.

Over 1,000 IT and security professionals submitted Druva's comprehensive Cyber Resilience Maturity Assessment. Their results reveal a troubling "resilience gap" between organizations' basic backup practices and the advanced capabilities needed to combat sophisticated cyber threats. While 67% of organizations express extreme confidence in their immutable, off-site backups, the data exposes critical weaknesses in detection, forensics, and rapid recovery capabilities. 

This blog explores the key trends, but for the full results, read our extensive white paper.

The Five Critical Gaps in Cyber Resilience

1. Strong Foundations, Weak Detection Capabilities

Organizations have invested heavily in backup fundamentals, with 67% implementing immutable, off-site backups and 91% deploying multi-factor authentication for backup administrators. However, significant vulnerabilities persist at higher maturity levels.

The assessment revealed that over 70% of companies lack reliable mechanisms to identify clean, pre-attack restore points or distinguish malware-infected data from clean backups. More concerning, approximately two-thirds operate without real-time alerting for backup compromise indicators, such as credential misuse, mass deletions, or API key abuse.

Only 12% of organizations can effectively leverage backup telemetry for forensic investigations, leaving 88% operating with limited visibility during critical incident response phases. This detection deficit undermines cyber resilience when organizations need it most, potentially leading to restoration of compromised data or extended recovery timeframes.

2. Inadequate Backup Infrastructure Protection

Despite widespread recognition of backup importance, only 38% of organizations treat backup systems as tier-1 critical assets receiving the same 24/7 security monitoring as production environments. This disparity creates exploitable vulnerabilities that sophisticated attackers routinely target.

While 79% of organizations maintain prompt patching schedules for backup infrastructure, implementation gaps persist. This highlights a significant advantage for organizations leveraging cloud backup services, as the vendor manages patching and infrastructure updates, eliminating this burden and associated challenges for the end-user. Approximately half have incomplete MFA rollouts across all backup assets, and 17% operate without any network isolation for backup environments, exposing these critical systems to lateral movement attacks.

The absence of comprehensive backup security monitoring represents a fundamental weakness. When backup systems lack integration with Security Operations Centers, organizations remain blind to attacks specifically targeting their last line of defense.

3. Underdeveloped Threat Detection and Recovery Capabilities

Beyond basic backup functionality, organizations demonstrate significant weaknesses in advanced threat detection and safe restoration processes. The assessment data reveals 71% lack reliable methods to reverse malicious backup deletions, while 80% cannot easily separate infected data from clean files during recovery operations.

Perhaps most critically, 83% of organizations would remain unaware if their backups were under active attack, with only 17% maintaining real-time alerting for anomalous activities, such as mass deletions or unauthorized encryption attempts. This detection blindness allows attackers to operate undetected, systematically compromising backup integrity before launching primary attacks.

The inability to rapidly identify malware-free backup versions transforms recovery from a straightforward restoration process into a time-consuming guessing game, extending downtime and increasing the likelihood of reinfection.

4. Manual, Slow Cyber Recovery Processes

Traditional disaster recovery planning focuses on hardware failures and natural disasters, but cyber recovery requires fundamentally different approaches. The assessment reveals that 71% of organizations lack automated capabilities to reverse malicious backup deletions, while 46% operate without methods to certify restored data cleanliness before production deployment.

These manual processes create significant delays during critical recovery phases. Without predefined cyber recovery playbooks, organizations must coordinate IT and security silos under extreme pressure, often resulting in extended outages and increased ransomware payment likelihood.

The complexity of cyber recovery extends beyond technical challenges, including unclear role definitions, approval processes, and communication protocols. Organizations frequently discover these gaps during actual incidents, when coordination failures can extend recovery timeframes from hours to weeks.

5. Untapped Forensic Potential in Backup Data

An organization's backup data is a critical source of evidence for incident response, yet it remains one of the most underutilized assets in cybersecurity. Over 90% of respondents cannot confidently determine sensitive data impact during attacks by analyzing backup content, while 71% lack the capabilities to extract data change lists around incident timeframes.

This forensic blindness severely hampers incident response effectiveness. Backup data provides historical snapshots that can reveal attack timelines, identify compromised files, and support compliance reporting requirements. Yet only 8% of organizations have integrated backup data with SIEM and XDR platforms, leaving critical investigative resources unexploited.

Without backup-based forensic capabilities, organizations struggle to answer fundamental breach questions: What data was compromised? How did attacks unfold? When did unauthorized changes occur? This information gap complicates regulatory compliance, customer notifications, and long-term security improvements.

Druva's Comprehensive Cyber Resilience Solution

Modern ransomware threats require equally modern defense strategies. Relying on backups as mere secondary systems or depending on manual recovery during critical incidents is no longer sufficient. Now is the time to strengthen cyber resilience—before attackers exploit these vulnerabilities. Druva's Data Security Cloud redefines backups, turning them into proactive defense tools with automated threat detection, swift recovery, integrated forensic capabilities, and interoperability with SIEM/XDR tools through integrations. To achieve true cyber resilience, organizations must evolve their backup strategies to counter today’s threats and safeguard business continuity.

Building True Cyber Resilience

To close the resilience gap, organizations must rethink their approach to data protection by integrating robust security, advanced detection, and streamlined recovery into their backup strategies. By hardening backups, leveraging intelligent tools, and practicing recovery processes, businesses can stay ahead of evolving ransomware threats and protect their critical data.  

Take action today! Assess your organization's cyber resilience and explore how Druva can help you strengthen your defenses with modern backup and recovery solutions. Take a free product tour.